hostus -KVM 2G内存 2核 洛杉矶vps主机简单评测

在香港vps主机便宜货盛行的时候,hostus早早上架香港节点让其火了一把,现在hostus已经渐渐的淡出了部分伙伴们的眼中。近期hostus上架了新的一批母鸡,开的小鸡采用KVM架构,数据中心在洛杉矶、华盛顿两个节点,在定价方面还是非常不错的,即使不使用任何优惠码,1G内存套餐月付7.95刀,还是具有一定的性价比。另外流量方面也还给的比较充足,最低512M内存套餐流量750G,端口为1000Mbps。在一上线的时候老耿自己就入手购买了最低配置512M内存套餐,也对其进行了简单的测试(hostus新KVM架构 512M内存 洛杉矶节点简单测试)。今天申请到一款2G内存的小鸡,主要还是看看大内存的小鸡跑分会是怎么样的一个状态呢?嘿嘿!

hostus

优惠码:KVMRELAUNCH30   老用户专用,首次折扣30%优惠,没什么实际意义。以下方案为折扣前价格,另外KVM架构,支持安装windows系统,建议1G或以上内存安装使用。官方提供的win系统需要2G内存以上的小鸡!

优惠方案

  • 核心:1核CPU
  • 内存:512MB
  • 硬盘:15GB
  • 流量:750GB
  • 端口:1Gbps
  • 架构:KVM
  • 价格:$4.35/month
  • 传送:购买链接
  • 核心:2核CPU
  • 内存:1GB
  • 硬盘:30GB
  • 流量:1TB
  • 端口:1Gbps
  • 架构:KVM
  • 价格:$7.95/month
  • 传送:购买链接
  • 核心:2核CPU
  • 内存:2GB
  • 硬盘:55GB
  • 流量:2TB
  • 端口:1Gbps
  • 架构:KVM
  • 价格:$13.95/month
  • 传送:购买链接

测试环境与配置:centos系统,官方原版;配置2核CPU  2G内存 ;洛杉矶节点

1、基本硬件配置

[root@7vps ~]# free -m
 total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 1877 135 1741 0 27 39
-/+ buffers/cache: 68 1808
Swap: 1023 0 1023
[root@7vps ~]# df -hal
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/vda3 53G 813M 50G 2% /
proc 0 0 0 - /proc
sysfs 0 0 0 - /sys
devpts 0 0 0 - /dev/pts
tmpfs 939M 0 939M 0% /dev/shm
/dev/vda1 477M 57M 395M 13% /boot
none 0 0 0 - /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc
[root@7vps ~]# lscpu
Architecture: x86_64
CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit, 64-bit
Byte Order: Little Endian
CPU(s): 2
On-line CPU(s) list: 0,1
Thread(s) per core: 1
Core(s) per socket: 2
Socket(s): 1
NUMA node(s): 1
Vendor ID: GenuineIntel
CPU family: 6
Model: 63
Stepping: 2
CPU MHz: 2399.996
BogoMIPS: 4799.99
Virtualization: VT-x
Hypervisor vendor: KVM
Virtualization type: full
L1d cache: 32K
L1i cache: 32K
L2 cache: 4096K
NUMA node0 CPU(s): 0,1

2G内存,默认1G swap,还算是不错啦!另外KVM给了2核,CPU也是当前流行的主流配置!

2、网络测试

[root@7vps ~]# wget cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
--2016-05-14 09:10:26-- http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net... 205.234.175.175
Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: “100mb.test”

100%[======================================>] 104,857,600 97.4M/s in 1.0s

2016-05-14 09:10:27 (97.4 MB/s) - “100mb.test” saved [104857600/104857600]

[root@7vps ~]# wget http://down.360.cn/360sd/360sd_x64_std_5.0.0.7033.exe
--2016-05-14 09:10:35-- http://down.360.cn/360sd/360sd_x64_std_5.0.0.7033.exe
Resolving down.360.cn... 59.37.80.20, 175.6.229.77
Connecting to down.360.cn|59.37.80.20|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 37480360 (36M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: “360sd_x64_std_5.0.0.7033.exe”

100%[======================================>] 37,480,360 8.51M/s in 6.5s

2016-05-14 09:10:43 (5.53 MB/s) - “360sd_x64_std_5.0.0.7033.exe” saved [37480360/37480360]

国外常规测试下载速度达到97M/s的速度,的确是G口,下载国内的360也能达到8M/s,也是不错的啦!

3、硬盘IO性能

[root@7vps ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 3.88487 s, 69.1 MB/s
[root@7vps ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 2.91755 s, 92.0 MB/s

硬盘性能还是不错的,对于流量几千IP的来说够用了,当然如果您的程序非常占IO也是么办法的。国内的阿里云、腾讯云。西数等硬盘IO一般,特别是华夏小云硬盘IO性能更低,对于小站足够使用,当然流量上万IP建议直接上高配置的服务器啦!

4、站长网ping测速

928045

5、无聊的跑分

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sat May 14 2016 10:38:04 - 11:06:16
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 29132129.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 3132.2 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 3710.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 788213.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 213018.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1672111.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1591584.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 304956.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 10003.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 5731.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1238.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 2207672.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 29132129.4 2496.3
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3132.2 569.5
Execl Throughput 43.0 3710.4 862.9
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 788213.9 1990.4
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 213018.3 1287.1
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1672111.4 2883.0
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1591584.4 1279.4
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 304956.7 762.4
Process Creation 126.0 10003.5 793.9
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 5731.8 1351.8
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1238.6 2064.4
System Call Overhead 15000.0 2207672.7 1471.8
 ========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1323.2

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sat May 14 2016 11:06:16 - 11:34:28
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 57209973.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 6247.9 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 8063.2 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 908645.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 250265.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2363073.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 3100104.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 604849.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 20494.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 9327.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1259.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 3523500.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 57209973.3 4902.3
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 6247.9 1136.0
Execl Throughput 43.0 8063.2 1875.2
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 908645.3 2294.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 250265.0 1512.2
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2363073.1 4074.3
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 3100104.5 2492.0
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 604849.3 1512.1
Process Creation 126.0 20494.9 1626.6
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 9327.5 2199.9
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1259.2 2098.7
System Call Overhead 15000.0 3523500.8 2349.0
 ========
System Benchmarks Index Score 2151.1

性能还是非常不错的,2核2G内存套餐跑分超过2000分是相当不错的啦!对于KVM架构适合建站的朋友,当然玩科学上网服务也是不错的!对于ping的测试老耿也是在高峰期ping还能平均在200左右还是不错的,hostus洛杉矶线路目前走的是亚洲优化段,经香港链接大陆,当然与所谓的电信直连之类的还是有点点差别!国外线路在高峰期不管那条或多或少延迟较高,部分丢包率也高,这些都是无法避免的!

还没回应

发表评论

电子邮件地址不会被公开。 必填项已用*标注